If you need effective isotropic radiated power (eirp) and total cable loss (lc) and you already have antenna gain (ga), cable length, cable length, cable loss, total cable loss (lc), connector loss (lc), frequency and type, frequency and type1800, frequency and type2400, frequency and type450, frequency and type900, cable loss — unknown frequency, transmitter output power (tx) and no. of connectors, this calculator does the substitution for you. It suits a quick check, a homework answer you want to confirm, or any figure you need to sanity test.
What Is the EIRP Calculator?
This eirp calculator is for the kind of problem where you know the physical quantities but not the number you need. It turns antenna gain (ga), cable length, cable length, cable loss, total cable loss (lc), connector loss (lc), frequency and type, frequency and type1800, frequency and type2400, frequency and type450, frequency and type900, cable loss — unknown frequency, transmitter output power (tx) and no. of connectors into effective isotropic radiated power (eirp) and total cable loss (lc).
Physics calculations go wrong in predictable ways, usually through mixing units or dropping a digit. Work through the result one step at a time and check that the figures are the size you would expect at each stage.
How the EIRP Physics Works
The relationship is applied step by step, and each step is a standard piece of physics rather than a single opaque formula. That means you can check the intermediate values against what the theory predicts, which is usually faster than checking only the final answer.
Keep every value in the same unit system throughout the calculation. Mixing metres and feet part way through is the single most common reason a correct formula gives a wrong answer.
Units, Assumptions and the Limits of the Model
The calculation assumes ideal conditions: no air resistance, no heat loss, and dimensions that do not change while you work. Those assumptions are reasonable for most classroom and engineering estimates, and unreasonable for anything more precise.
Where a value is a rate, it has to be quoted for the same period as everything else. A per-hour figure cannot be combined with a per-day figure without converting one of them first.
A Worked Example
Working through an example, with antenna gain (ga) set to 10, cable length set to 5, cable length set to 2, the calculator returns effective isotropic radiated power (eirp) of -15, and effective isotropic radiated power (eirp) (eirpper ft) of -505, and total cable loss (lc) of 4. Substitute your own figures and the same steps produce the same kind of answer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do I need to work out effective isotropic radiated power (eirp)?
Enter antenna gain (ga), cable length, cable length, cable loss, total cable loss (lc), connector loss (lc), frequency and type, frequency and type1800, frequency and type2400, frequency and type450, frequency and type900, cable loss — unknown frequency, transmitter output power (tx) and no. of connectors. The calculator then works through the relationship and reports effective isotropic radiated power (eirp) and total cable loss (lc).
What does the eirp actually calculate?
It takes antenna gain (ga), cable length, cable length, cable loss, total cable loss (lc), connector loss (lc), frequency and type, frequency and type1800, frequency and type2400, frequency and type450, frequency and type900, cable loss — unknown frequency, transmitter output power (tx) and no. of connectors and converts them into effective isotropic radiated power (eirp) and total cable loss (lc) using the standard relationship for this problem. Each step is applied in turn, so every output is traceable back to the numbers you typed in.
How should I enter antenna gain (ga)?
Use the value you actually have, in the unit shown next to the field. Enter every value in the same unit system. The calculator assumes the figures you supply are consistent, so it cannot correct a mistake that happens before the calculation starts.
Is the answer exact?
It is as exact as the formula and the inputs allow. The method itself is the standard one for this problem, so the only sources of error are the figures you enter and the precision you ask for.
Can I use this for a quick estimate as well as a precise answer?
Yes. The calculator is built for quick checks, so round your inputs to a sensible number of significant figures and the result will be just as useful. If you need more precision, keep the same method and add digits to the inputs rather than adjusting the method itself.